#Steam kerbal space program 2 mods

No comment needed to the above statement - this game has very dedicated following (which I was part of before EA was announced out the blue and I recognized that not everything was OK) with hard core fans who view most criticisms of the game as a threat to their desire to see KSP2 become all it can be according to their desires. How about it folks? Some positive review bombing to neuter the internet warriors? I'll be leaving a positive review as a placeholder to offset this behaviour, reserving the right to change it if things don't pan out. Publishers will weigh up negative press against potential returns. The problem is that it puts this project in jeopardy, I don't want to see a 'mixed' or 'negative' tag on steam reviews without giving the devs a chance to show us what they can do. I suspect this will be a thing on Friday, maybe mitigated by the slightly higher than usual pricetag as a barrier for entry. Just before the release of the game, the user jacksawild on the official KSP2 forum made following post which I found typical for certain part of the KSP2 community: If your (dev company) payout or someone's management bonus is contingent on game not being negatively perceived, then there is a motive for boosting your score but not too much to make it obvious.ĭo I believe this happened with KSP2?- absolutely NOT.īecause if you view posts before the release, when some of us were pointing out all the red flags (and there were plenty enough to compete with North Korean parades) this project had there was plenty of those that rushed to defend the yet unreleased game. Pretty much anything below 'Very Positive' gives me pause and if it's not blue, it's unlikely I'll purchase.Ĭontractual obligations. People don't see 'Mixed Reviews' and think 'I should buy this'. Originally posted by Alshain:I don't understand the point in wasting money on reviews if you aren't going for positive. What a giant drag.Įdit: I know most of the WOW features in KSP1 were mods, but these guys had one heck of a template to start from. Like WTH is that lazy crap, they add all this insane animation in trailers but cant add a few disappearing rocks? They should've just made a movie. The cherry on top for me is the news about colonization being a MENU and resources will not be dynamic. Wouldve been nice to get a few science parts too on release, just to play around with on kerbin regardless if they had a purpose. For a game where you literally build rockets, that is a massive downgrade. I was so excited for the orbital assembly bases and colonization features, but it seems like even no mans sky will perhaps have better colonization aspects than KSP2 in the form of basic minecraft style bases. We already had everything they were promising in road map in the form of mods, they just needed to put it all together.

However we are now already more than halfway through the original games dev timeline with about 5-10% of the features that were in game by year 5 but a smaller team.

#Steam kerbal space program 2 mods

Physics mods and pilot assistance for lax trips or newcomers (MechJeb) Near Future tech parts (3-4, maybe 5 separate parts packs) Interstellar Parts mods + Additional solar systems

So are these guys actually innovating anything or just stitching together mods from the original game in a way that totally ruins the experience? Like for comparison. I took a long break from KSP since #2 was announced. I got PO'd a second ago when I learned about the 'Dark Multiplayer Mod' for KSP original.